Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
DES Reforms
#102224 02/27/07 12:59 AM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 573
M
Registered Visitor
OP Offline
Registered Visitor
M
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 573
"servicemembers have complained that the military services are not consistent in evaluations and do not follow the Department of Veterans Affairs schedule of rating disabilities."


WASHINGTON, Feb. 23, 2007 -

The Defense Department is putting in place
reforms to its disability evaluation system and working to ensure the decisions of the isability Advisory Council are fast and fair, Pentagon
officials said today.

The system is used to evaluate servicemembers' disabilities and separate or retain them, as appropriate. Servicemembers who are separated with at least a 30 percent disability rating receive disability retirement pay, medical benefits and commissary privileges. With a rating below 30 percent, veterans receive severance pay, but no benefits.

In the past, each service had its own disability evaluation system. Now DoD has put in place an overarching DoD-level framework with a single
information system, Pentagon officials said. Each service manages its caseload under that framework.

The war on terrorism has taxed the system, officials said. Medical and transportation advances have allowed more servicemembers to survive more serious wounds than in previous wars. In fiscal 2006, service eligibility board caseloads were 13,162 for the Army, 5,684 for the
naval services, and 4,139 for the Air Force. In 2001, the numbers were: 7,218 for the Army, 4,999 for the naval services and 2,816 in the Air
Force.

DoD officials acknowledge that servicemembers have complaints about the system. According to recent media reports, servicemembers have
complained that the military services are not consistent in evaluations and do not follow the Department of Veterans Affairs schedule of rating
disabilities. They say it takes too long for evaluations to be processed, the process is unnecessarily complicated, and personnel
running the system are inadequately trained in its nuances.

DoD is aware of these problems and is working to address them, said Marine Maj. Stewart Upton, a Pentagon spokesman. "We are in the midst of
a business-process review that will generate improvements to program effectiveness," he said. "We are especially concerned with a balance of what constitutes prompt adjudication, while maintaining reasonable flexibility within the system to ensure recoveries are not
inappropriately rushed."

He said the services have increased the number of people involved in the process.

DoD is committed to providing quality health care to servicemembers and a "full and fair due process" for disability evaluation and
compensation, he said.

In fiscal 2006 most cases were processed within 70 days, officials said.


The disability process begins with medical evaluation boards at military hospitals. Attending physicians evaluate each patient, looking at conditions that may make the servicemember unfit for duty. If the
condition or wound is judged to make the servicemember unfit, the board refers the case to a physical evaluation board. The board has a mix of medical officers and line officers. They determine if the problem is service-related or not. The panel further recommends compensation for the injury or condition and recommends the disability rating.

The Army has three boards at Fort Sam Houston, Texas; Walter Reed Army Medical Center here; and Fort Lewis, Wash. The Navy has a board at the
Washington Navy Yard here. The Air Force board meets in San Antonio.

"Servicemembers are afforded due process to ensure their cases and concerns can be fairly considered," Upton said. "Servicemembers also
have rights of appeal at specific points in the process should they disagree with their ratings."

Re: DES Reforms
#102225 03/08/07 03:01 AM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 449
L
Registered Visitor
Offline
Registered Visitor
L
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 449
So, if all this is the case for active duty servicemembers and those injured in Iraq, it seems those of us who have been out for awhile and seeking increased compensation may be facing an even greater obstacle. I don't know how many cases were pending before the war, but I know my claim adjudication began in Apr 03. That was for a rate increase and I'm just now being scheduled for a hearing b4 the traveling board.

Mike, I sent everything you provided and two more letters from my VA docs. My DAV NSO thought it would provoke Regional to reconsider b4 the hearing. But I haven't heard anything. I know I called the RO a few days ago and they stated there is now a suspense date placed on my claim file. They stated that it meant the RO needed to do something with my file by 03/11/07 because at the end of the month it will be four years without any type of break in the process. Anyway, will see what happens and be sure to share it with you guys.

Re: DES Reforms
#102226 03/08/07 12:26 PM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 573
M
Registered Visitor
OP Offline
Registered Visitor
M
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 573
Just to clarify...the above is about the DoD disability system, not the VA system although that will be wire brushed as well. The DoD system review involves all disabled service members, not just those injured in combat.

Mike


Moderated by  ElinAslanyan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4